154,902+ Pet Insurance Reviews You Can Trust

Pet parents across the U.S. and Canada have left over 150,000 verified reviews—real stories, real experiences, real insight. Whether you're after the best price, fastest claims, or friendliest service, our review hub makes it easy to compare top providers and find your perfect match.

236,046 total


Most selected providers in "November, 2025"

This chart shows the distribution of the most selected pet insurance providers in November, 2025.

Providers with highest rating

Embrace

20,329 reviews

4.9
Healthy Paws

10,791 reviews

4.9
Fetch

27,484 reviews

4.9
Pets Best

14,162 reviews

4.9
Trupanion

63,005 reviews

4.8

Category with most reviews

This chart shows the distribution of review categories.

Verified January 17, 2025

Easy process

Easy process to sign up my cat. I really like the online comparison to other pet insurances. Very helpful!

Insurer: Pumpkin

By: Corina M.

January 17, 2025

So far all of my claims have been easy…

So far all of my claims have been easy to processed. Communication was relayed whether is it’s delayed or what to expect next. Direct deposit option i opted for has been very good and my refunds credited directly into my account within a few days after the decision has been made.

Insurer: Pets Best

By: Pacharee K

January 17, 2025

Terrible

Terrible. People with zero medical knowledge are following a vague flow chart that is divorced from reality. An allergy will prevent your pet from getting reimbursement for ANYTHING because they are "secondary symptoms." Giardia is NOT a symptom of an allergy. Simply garbage. Cancelling coverage now.

Insurer: ASPCA

By: Baloo The Bear

January 17, 2025

Deny Deny Deny

Fetch denied medical coverage due to lack of documentation requirement that is found on one sentence of a 36-page claim document. Even though my pet had no pre-existing medical conditions - Fetch denied the claim and was delinquent in providing updates about their review process claiming several 'truths' such as claim documentation takes up to a week to upload and it takes several days to review, etc. I wasted over a thousand dollars on a policy and hours on the phone chasing an insurance company and trying to convince them to do the right thing to no avail. --------------- In response to the reply from Fetch - I believe your understanding of our situation is inaccurate which isn't surprising considering I receive conflicting information from Fetch regularly. Here are the facts: My pre-authorization for coverage was for the leg not previously injured and surgically repaired which Fetch also denied, but as it was pre-existing I did not dispute that conclusion. What was very disappointing to learn was the other leg was not covered despite having medical evidence from the veterinarian that it was in good health both at the inception of the policy but also at the 30-day mark of the policy when there was an expectation for us to provide 'a certificate of knee health' to indicate there was no pre-existing condition of that leg. Fetch decided that because that exam and 'certificate' wasn't provided to them in the first 30 days - they would stand on that very specific and shaky ground to leverage the opportunity to deny coverage suggesting they place higher value on profitability vs. customer experience and/or pet health. The choice to do the right thing was simple - yet it wasn't taken so I am offended at any communication from Fetch which indicates sympathy. If Fetch was sympathetic or empathetic to our situation they could make the choice to cover a 'certified' healthy knee that was healthy for the first 6 months of the policy (the entirety of the waiting period). Instead they chose to bow out because the notation of health occurred on day 60 vs. 30. Even though we all know that if the knee was healthy on day 60 it was certainly healthy on day 30. If you're truly sorry then cover the claim or just refund me the money I've wasted on this policy so I can try to cover these medical expenses myself.

Insurer: Fetch

By: Mark Alan Norton

January 17, 2025

Deny Deny Deny

Fetch denied medical coverage due to lack of documentation requirement that is found on one sentence of a 36-page claim document. Even though my pet had no pre-existing medical conditions - Fetch denied the claim and was delinquent in providing updates about their review process claiming several 'truths' such as claim documentation takes up to a week to upload and it takes several days to review, etc. I wasted over a thousand dollars on a policy and hours on the phone chasing an insurance company and trying to convince them to do the right thing to no avail. --------------- In response to the reply from Fetch - I believe your understanding of our situation is inaccurate which isn't surprising considering I receive conflicting information from Fetch regularly. Here are the facts: My pre-authorization for coverage was for the leg not previously injured and surgically repaired which Fetch also denied, but as it was pre-existing I did not dispute that conclusion. What was very disappointing to learn was the other leg was not covered despite having medical evidence from the veterinarian that it was in good health both at the inception of the policy but also at the 30-day mark of the policy when there was an expectation for us to provide 'a certificate of knee health' to indicate there was no pre-existing condition of that leg. Fetch decided that because that exam and 'certificate' wasn't provided to them in the first 30 days - they would stand on that very specific and shaky ground to leverage the opportunity to deny coverage suggesting they place higher value on profitability vs. customer experience and/or pet health. The choice to do the right thing was simple - yet it wasn't taken so I am offended at any communication from Fetch which indicates sympathy. If Fetch was sympathetic or empathetic to our situation they could make the choice to cover a 'certified' healthy knee that was healthy for the first 6 months of the policy (the entirety of the waiting period). Instead they chose to bow out because the notation of health occurred on day 60 vs. 30. Even though we all know that if the knee was healthy on day 60 it was certainly healthy on day 30. If you're truly sorry then cover the claim or just refund me the money I've wasted on this policy so I can try to cover these medical expenses myself.

Insurer: Fetch

By: Mark Alan Norton

January 17, 2025

Claim Filling

I have not even started writing the review and I already received an email stating they received my two claims! Something that I really enjoy is the ease of submitting a claim. The only thing I don't care for completing is stating the purpose of the claim even that is a drop down menu. It only have certain medical terms versus all the terms so when you copy and paste whatever the doctor's office wrote it shows something closely related to what the doctor wrote. I had to pick wellness because it mentioned spade and one claim was the pre ops checks and then the Ovariohysterectomy (spade I guess). :-) Besides this, it is pretty simple!

Insurer: Embrace

By: Coastie

January 17, 2025

Their customer service is superb

Their customer service is superb. The only negative thing I can say about the company is that as the pet gets older the premiums become prohibitively high. But they always reimburse on a timely basis and their customer service is great, the best around.

Insurer: Embrace

By: Margaret Willis

January 16, 2025

Cancer treatment and follow up.

My cat was diagnosed for brain cancer and was treated about 3 months ago. The diagnosis process was long and difficult, and the treatment took 5 weeks after that. Pets Best was great the entire way. I recently took him for a follow up exam and tests. All results were great and he is doing well, and pets best had processed my claim and issued a payment within a week of my submitting the claim. It was a great experience. If it wasn't for pets best, I wouldn't have a happy healthy kitty at home who is able to enjoy life.

Insurer: Pets Best

By: Alex

Useful
Verified January 16, 2025

GREAT BENEFIT… After years of paying premiums this…

After years of paying premiums this company ran me through the ringer to get reimbursed for an emergency room visit that ended in euthanasing our pet. I’ve had 2 claims both were eventually approved but not for over a mont until I did all the leg work collecting vet paperwork. GREAT BENEFIT has nothing on them

Insurer: Embrace

By: Phil Moore

January 16, 2025

Very Helpful

Great service very knowledgeable customer service.

Insurer: Embrace

By: John Tindall

Compare top pet insurance providers plans.