154,902+ Pet Insurance Reviews You Can Trust
Pet parents across the U.S. and Canada have left over 150,000 verified reviews—real stories, real experiences, real insight. Whether you're after the best price, fastest claims, or friendliest service, our review hub makes it easy to compare top providers and find your perfect match.
235,974 total
What are you looking for?
Most selected providers in "November, 2025"
This chart shows the distribution of the most selected pet insurance providers in November, 2025.
Providers with highest rating
20,325 reviews
10,787 reviews
27,479 reviews
14,161 reviews
63,005 reviews
Category with most reviews
This chart shows the distribution of review categories.
They violated my human rights
Fetch has violated my human and Charter-protected rights as a disabled person by denying a six-day accommodation for a delayed claim submission, which was due to my cognitive disabilities. I filed a claim with the HRTO, to which they initially failed to respond. When they finally did respond, it was to request an extension of the response deadline amounting to an astonishing 67 days. The hypocrisy is glaring. Upon responding, they escalated their stance, reinforcing their ableism and discriminatory actions. The level of blatant ableism exhibited by Fetch is appalling, reminiscent of a bygone era. Their conduct has been profoundly egregious. This case is ongoing. ✨️Addressing Fetch’s Response to This Review✨️ Your response is nothing more than empty words designed to save face, and it rings hollow in light of FETCH’S actions. At no point during this process has FETCH shown any genuine regard for the rights of disabled people, and I have documented evidence to substantiate my claim. This is not a matter of my opinion. FETCH’S outright denial of my accommodation request was blatantly discriminatory and a violation of FETCH’S legal obligations. FETCH refused to engage in the legally required accommodation process, demonstrating a clear disregard for my rights. When served by the HRTO, FETCH doubled down on its discriminatory behavior, digging its heels into ableism with shocking audacity. This grotesque response only further substantiates the fact that FETCH does not value fairness or inclusivity in any meaningful capacity. FETCH’S actions speak volumes, and they completely undermine the hollow platitudes in your response. FETCH has demonstrated, time and again, that it does not take disabled people’s rights seriously. This is not a matter of “frustration” on my part—it’s a matter of blatant discrimination and systemic ableism on FETCH’S part. If FETCH truly cares about fairness and inclusivity, it must start by owning up to its actions.
Insurer: Fetch Canada
By: The FERG
They violated my human rights
Fetch has violated my human and Charter-protected rights as a disabled person by denying a six-day accommodation for a delayed claim submission, which was due to my cognitive disabilities. I filed a claim with the HRTO, to which they initially failed to respond. When they finally did respond, it was to request an extension of the response deadline amounting to an astonishing 67 days. The hypocrisy is glaring. Upon responding, they escalated their stance, reinforcing their ableism and discriminatory actions. The level of blatant ableism exhibited by Fetch is appalling, reminiscent of a bygone era. Their conduct has been profoundly egregious. This case is ongoing. ✨️Addressing Fetch’s Response to This Review✨️ Your response is nothing more than empty words designed to save face, and it rings hollow in light of FETCH’S actions. At no point during this process has FETCH shown any genuine regard for the rights of disabled people, and I have documented evidence to substantiate my claim. This is not a matter of my opinion. FETCH’S outright denial of my accommodation request was blatantly discriminatory and a violation of FETCH’S legal obligations. FETCH refused to engage in the legally required accommodation process, demonstrating a clear disregard for my rights. When served by the HRTO, FETCH doubled down on its discriminatory behavior, digging its heels into ableism with shocking audacity. This grotesque response only further substantiates the fact that FETCH does not value fairness or inclusivity in any meaningful capacity. FETCH’S actions speak volumes, and they completely undermine the hollow platitudes in your response. FETCH has demonstrated, time and again, that it does not take disabled people’s rights seriously. This is not a matter of “frustration” on my part—it’s a matter of blatant discrimination and systemic ableism on FETCH’S part. If FETCH truly cares about fairness and inclusivity, it must start by owning up to its actions.
Insurer: Fetch Canada
By: The FERG
They violated my human rights
Fetch has violated my human and Charter-protected rights as a disabled person by denying a six-day accommodation for a delayed claim submission, which was due to my cognitive disabilities. I filed a claim with the HRTO, to which they initially failed to respond. When they finally did respond, it was to request an extension of the response deadline amounting to an astonishing 67 days. The hypocrisy is glaring. Upon responding, they escalated their stance, reinforcing their ableism and discriminatory actions. The level of blatant ableism exhibited by Fetch is appalling, reminiscent of a bygone era. Their conduct has been profoundly egregious. This case is ongoing. ✨️Addressing Fetch’s Response to This Review✨️ Your response is nothing more than empty words designed to save face, and it rings hollow in light of FETCH’S actions. At no point during this process has FETCH shown any genuine regard for the rights of disabled people, and I have documented evidence to substantiate my claim. This is not a matter of my opinion. FETCH’S outright denial of my accommodation request was blatantly discriminatory and a violation of FETCH’S legal obligations. FETCH refused to engage in the legally required accommodation process, demonstrating a clear disregard for my rights. When served by the HRTO, FETCH doubled down on its discriminatory behavior, digging its heels into ableism with shocking audacity. This grotesque response only further substantiates the fact that FETCH does not value fairness or inclusivity in any meaningful capacity. FETCH’S actions speak volumes, and they completely undermine the hollow platitudes in your response. FETCH has demonstrated, time and again, that it does not take disabled people’s rights seriously. This is not a matter of “frustration” on my part—it’s a matter of blatant discrimination and systemic ableism on FETCH’S part. If FETCH truly cares about fairness and inclusivity, it must start by owning up to its actions.
Insurer: Fetch Canada
By: The FERG
They violated my human rights
Fetch has violated my human and Charter-protected rights as a disabled person by denying a six-day accommodation for a delayed claim submission, which was due to my cognitive disabilities. I filed a claim with the HRTO, to which they initially failed to respond. When they finally did respond, it was to request an extension of the response deadline amounting to an astonishing 67 days. The hypocrisy is glaring. Upon responding, they escalated their stance, reinforcing their ableism and discriminatory actions. The level of blatant ableism exhibited by Fetch is appalling, reminiscent of a bygone era. Their conduct has been profoundly egregious. This case is ongoing. ✨️Addressing Fetch’s Response to This Review✨️ Your response is nothing more than empty words designed to save face, and it rings hollow in light of FETCH’S actions. At no point during this process has FETCH shown any genuine regard for the rights of disabled people, and I have documented evidence to substantiate my claim. This is not a matter of my opinion. FETCH’S outright denial of my accommodation request was blatantly discriminatory and a violation of FETCH’S legal obligations. FETCH refused to engage in the legally required accommodation process, demonstrating a clear disregard for my rights. When served by the HRTO, FETCH doubled down on its discriminatory behavior, digging its heels into ableism with shocking audacity. This grotesque response only further substantiates the fact that FETCH does not value fairness or inclusivity in any meaningful capacity. FETCH’S actions speak volumes, and they completely undermine the hollow platitudes in your response. FETCH has demonstrated, time and again, that it does not take disabled people’s rights seriously. This is not a matter of “frustration” on my part—it’s a matter of blatant discrimination and systemic ableism on FETCH’S part. If FETCH truly cares about fairness and inclusivity, it must start by owning up to its actions.
Insurer: Fetch Canada
By: The FERG
They violated my human rights
Fetch has violated my human and Charter-protected rights as a disabled person by denying a six-day accommodation for a delayed claim submission, which was due to my cognitive disabilities. I filed a claim with the HRTO, to which they initially failed to respond. When they finally did respond, it was to request an extension of the response deadline amounting to an astonishing 67 days. The hypocrisy is glaring. Upon responding, they escalated their stance, reinforcing their ableism and discriminatory actions. The level of blatant ableism exhibited by Fetch is appalling, reminiscent of a bygone era. Their conduct has been profoundly egregious. This case is ongoing. ✨️Addressing Fetch’s Response to This Review✨️ Your response is nothing more than empty words designed to save face, and it rings hollow in light of FETCH’S actions. At no point during this process has FETCH shown any genuine regard for the rights of disabled people, and I have documented evidence to substantiate my claim. This is not a matter of my opinion. FETCH’S outright denial of my accommodation request was blatantly discriminatory and a violation of FETCH’S legal obligations. FETCH refused to engage in the legally required accommodation process, demonstrating a clear disregard for my rights. When served by the HRTO, FETCH doubled down on its discriminatory behavior, digging its heels into ableism with shocking audacity. This grotesque response only further substantiates the fact that FETCH does not value fairness or inclusivity in any meaningful capacity. FETCH’S actions speak volumes, and they completely undermine the hollow platitudes in your response. FETCH has demonstrated, time and again, that it does not take disabled people’s rights seriously. This is not a matter of “frustration” on my part—it’s a matter of blatant discrimination and systemic ableism on FETCH’S part. If FETCH truly cares about fairness and inclusivity, it must start by owning up to its actions.
Insurer: Fetch Canada
By: The FERG
They violated my human rights
Fetch has violated my human and Charter-protected rights as a disabled person by denying a six-day accommodation for a delayed claim submission, which was due to my cognitive disabilities. I filed a claim with the HRTO, to which they initially failed to respond. When they finally did respond, it was to request an extension of the response deadline amounting to an astonishing 67 days. The hypocrisy is glaring. Upon responding, they escalated their stance, reinforcing their ableism and discriminatory actions. The level of blatant ableism exhibited by Fetch is appalling, reminiscent of a bygone era. Their conduct has been profoundly egregious. This case is ongoing. ✨️Addressing Fetch’s Response to This Review✨️ Your response is nothing more than empty words designed to save face, and it rings hollow in light of FETCH’S actions. At no point during this process has FETCH shown any genuine regard for the rights of disabled people, and I have documented evidence to substantiate my claim. This is not a matter of my opinion. FETCH’S outright denial of my accommodation request was blatantly discriminatory and a violation of FETCH’S legal obligations. FETCH refused to engage in the legally required accommodation process, demonstrating a clear disregard for my rights. When served by the HRTO, FETCH doubled down on its discriminatory behavior, digging its heels into ableism with shocking audacity. This grotesque response only further substantiates the fact that FETCH does not value fairness or inclusivity in any meaningful capacity. FETCH’S actions speak volumes, and they completely undermine the hollow platitudes in your response. FETCH has demonstrated, time and again, that it does not take disabled people’s rights seriously. This is not a matter of “frustration” on my part—it’s a matter of blatant discrimination and systemic ableism on FETCH’S part. If FETCH truly cares about fairness and inclusivity, it must start by owning up to its actions.
Insurer: Fetch Canada
By: The FERG
They violated my human rights
Fetch has violated my human and Charter-protected rights as a disabled person by denying a six-day accommodation for a delayed claim submission, which was due to my cognitive disabilities. I filed a claim with the HRTO, to which they initially failed to respond. When they finally did respond, it was to request an extension of the response deadline amounting to an astonishing 67 days. The hypocrisy is glaring. Upon responding, they escalated their stance, reinforcing their ableism and discriminatory actions. The level of blatant ableism exhibited by Fetch is appalling, reminiscent of a bygone era. Their conduct has been profoundly egregious. This case is ongoing. ✨️Addressing Fetch’s Response to This Review✨️ Your response is nothing more than empty words designed to save face, and it rings hollow in light of FETCH’S actions. At no point during this process has FETCH shown any genuine regard for the rights of disabled people, and I have documented evidence to substantiate my claim. This is not a matter of my opinion. FETCH’S outright denial of my accommodation request was blatantly discriminatory and a violation of FETCH’S legal obligations. FETCH refused to engage in the legally required accommodation process, demonstrating a clear disregard for my rights. When served by the HRTO, FETCH doubled down on its discriminatory behavior, digging its heels into ableism with shocking audacity. This grotesque response only further substantiates the fact that FETCH does not value fairness or inclusivity in any meaningful capacity. FETCH’S actions speak volumes, and they completely undermine the hollow platitudes in your response. FETCH has demonstrated, time and again, that it does not take disabled people’s rights seriously. This is not a matter of “frustration” on my part—it’s a matter of blatant discrimination and systemic ableism on FETCH’S part. If FETCH truly cares about fairness and inclusivity, it must start by owning up to its actions.
Insurer: Fetch Canada
By: The FERG
They violated my human rights
Fetch has violated my human and Charter-protected rights as a disabled person by denying a six-day accommodation for a delayed claim submission, which was due to my cognitive disabilities. I filed a claim with the HRTO, to which they initially failed to respond. When they finally did respond, it was to request an extension of the response deadline amounting to an astonishing 67 days. The hypocrisy is glaring. Upon responding, they escalated their stance, reinforcing their ableism and discriminatory actions. The level of blatant ableism exhibited by Fetch is appalling, reminiscent of a bygone era. Their conduct has been profoundly egregious. This case is ongoing. ✨️Addressing Fetch’s Response to This Review✨️ Your response is nothing more than empty words designed to save face, and it rings hollow in light of FETCH’S actions. At no point during this process has FETCH shown any genuine regard for the rights of disabled people, and I have documented evidence to substantiate my claim. This is not a matter of my opinion. FETCH’S outright denial of my accommodation request was blatantly discriminatory and a violation of FETCH’S legal obligations. FETCH refused to engage in the legally required accommodation process, demonstrating a clear disregard for my rights. When served by the HRTO, FETCH doubled down on its discriminatory behavior, digging its heels into ableism with shocking audacity. This grotesque response only further substantiates the fact that FETCH does not value fairness or inclusivity in any meaningful capacity. FETCH’S actions speak volumes, and they completely undermine the hollow platitudes in your response. FETCH has demonstrated, time and again, that it does not take disabled people’s rights seriously. This is not a matter of “frustration” on my part—it’s a matter of blatant discrimination and systemic ableism on FETCH’S part. If FETCH truly cares about fairness and inclusivity, it must start by owning up to its actions.
Insurer: Fetch Canada
By: The FERG
They violated my human rights
Fetch has violated my human and Charter-protected rights as a disabled person by denying a six-day accommodation for a delayed claim submission, which was due to my cognitive disabilities. I filed a claim with the HRTO, to which they initially failed to respond. When they finally did respond, it was to request an extension of the response deadline amounting to an astonishing 67 days. The hypocrisy is glaring. Upon responding, they escalated their stance, reinforcing their ableism and discriminatory actions. The level of blatant ableism exhibited by Fetch is appalling, reminiscent of a bygone era. Their conduct has been profoundly egregious. This case is ongoing. ✨️Addressing Fetch’s Response to This Review✨️ Your response is nothing more than empty words designed to save face, and it rings hollow in light of FETCH’S actions. At no point during this process has FETCH shown any genuine regard for the rights of disabled people, and I have documented evidence to substantiate my claim. This is not a matter of my opinion. FETCH’S outright denial of my accommodation request was blatantly discriminatory and a violation of FETCH’S legal obligations. FETCH refused to engage in the legally required accommodation process, demonstrating a clear disregard for my rights. When served by the HRTO, FETCH doubled down on its discriminatory behavior, digging its heels into ableism with shocking audacity. This grotesque response only further substantiates the fact that FETCH does not value fairness or inclusivity in any meaningful capacity. FETCH’S actions speak volumes, and they completely undermine the hollow platitudes in your response. FETCH has demonstrated, time and again, that it does not take disabled people’s rights seriously. This is not a matter of “frustration” on my part—it’s a matter of blatant discrimination and systemic ableism on FETCH’S part. If FETCH truly cares about fairness and inclusivity, it must start by owning up to its actions.
Insurer: Fetch Canada
By: The FERG
They violated my human rights
Fetch has violated my human and Charter-protected rights as a disabled person by denying a six-day accommodation for a delayed claim submission, which was due to my cognitive disabilities. I filed a claim with the HRTO, to which they initially failed to respond. When they finally did respond, it was to request an extension of the response deadline amounting to an astonishing 67 days. The hypocrisy is glaring. Upon responding, they escalated their stance, reinforcing their ableism and discriminatory actions. The level of blatant ableism exhibited by Fetch is appalling, reminiscent of a bygone era. Their conduct has been profoundly egregious. This case is ongoing. ✨️Addressing Fetch’s Response to This Review✨️ Your response is nothing more than empty words designed to save face, and it rings hollow in light of FETCH’S actions. At no point during this process has FETCH shown any genuine regard for the rights of disabled people, and I have documented evidence to substantiate my claim. This is not a matter of my opinion. FETCH’S outright denial of my accommodation request was blatantly discriminatory and a violation of FETCH’S legal obligations. FETCH refused to engage in the legally required accommodation process, demonstrating a clear disregard for my rights. When served by the HRTO, FETCH doubled down on its discriminatory behavior, digging its heels into ableism with shocking audacity. This grotesque response only further substantiates the fact that FETCH does not value fairness or inclusivity in any meaningful capacity. FETCH’S actions speak volumes, and they completely undermine the hollow platitudes in your response. FETCH has demonstrated, time and again, that it does not take disabled people’s rights seriously. This is not a matter of “frustration” on my part—it’s a matter of blatant discrimination and systemic ableism on FETCH’S part. If FETCH truly cares about fairness and inclusivity, it must start by owning up to its actions.
Insurer: Fetch Canada
By: The FERG