154,902+ Pet Insurance Reviews You Can Trust
Pet parents across the U.S. and Canada have left over 150,000 verified reviews—real stories, real experiences, real insight. Whether you're after the best price, fastest claims, or friendliest service, our review hub makes it easy to compare top providers and find your perfect match.
236,135 total
What are you looking for?
Most selected providers in "November, 2025"
This chart shows the distribution of the most selected pet insurance providers in November, 2025.
Providers with highest rating
20,332 reviews
10,797 reviews
27,491 reviews
14,162 reviews
63,007 reviews
Category with most reviews
This chart shows the distribution of review categories.
Fast and easy
Was fast and easy
Insurer: Furkin
By: Vladimir
Amazing customer service
You guys were amazing from start to finish, if i had questions they were answered so quickly and payment was so fastâ¦thank you soo much
Insurer: Furkin
By: Jamie
The no worries on line process for submitting…
The on line process for submitting claim was direct and easy. Quick response back made it worry free
Insurer: Pets Best
By: Linda Mccarthy
Easy to use and quick reimbursement
So far we have had Figo for our dog for one year. We made several claims during the year and one was a pretty large claim. We were reimbursed according to our policy and received the money back in a few days. The claim process is super easy to do on your phone through the app and I like that in an emergency you don’t need to get approval from the insurance.
Insurer: Figo
By: Erin P.
AMAZING company
Highly recommend this company. They have covered every claim so far, and have been nothing short of fantastic. Thank you pets plus us!
Insurer: Pets Plus Us
By: Janelle
Quick Claim Response
We are happy with manypet’s quick response with a claim under our Wellness Policy for our beloved dog. Their service gives us confidence to have also the Accident/Injury Insurance in case of something unforeseen ever comes up.
Insurer: ManyPets
By: Paul
Great price for puppy insurance
Great price for puppy insurance. Hope I don't need it except fir wellness care.
Insurer: ASPCA
By: Shelly Johnson
My reimbursement claim was handled…
My reimbursement claim was handled within 2 weeks of submitting it and the money arrived during the 3rd week. I really appreciate the fast turnaround.
Insurer: Pets Best
By: Debbie
Predatory practices: Covered services denied/ vet language ignored and other language inserted to justify "preexisting condition"
3/21/23 - account management team: "Any condition for which a Veterinarian provided medical advice, the Pet received treatment for, or the pet displayed signs or symptoms consistent with the stated condition prior to the effective date of a policy or during any waiting period is considered pre-existing and excluded from coverage." The waiting period for an illness is 14 days and 3 for an injury. I saw the vet 12 days in. The "stated condition" referred to above is conjunctivitis, and the vet did not note this condition or any symptoms associated with it but said "injury." This "condition" was arrived at entirely by the claims dept. 3/21/23 - was told when I contacted to discuss claim again that even with 100% of other decisions noted as errors made by initial reviewer by Pets Best themselves, decision classifying case as an illness and inserting a diagnosis not even suspected by vet would NOT be considered for even a review without an appeal. I was told a supervisor would contact me between 24-48 hours. UPDATED: My experience has been negative. I enrolled in Dec 2022 for 5 pets. I've received conflicting information about 3 seperate things related to the claims process. It doesn't seem the people processing claims are reading closely as they denied claims very clearly aligned with the wellness plan. My initial claim was made Jan 27th and included an injury item and wellness items from the same visit. Records were submitted and confirmed to be received in mid Feb. It took 4 times to have the wellness plan items annotated and covered correctly despite being clearly itemized on my bill. The injury was classified as "illness - conjunctivitis", which is listed no where on the medical records. My vet used the word injury. UPDATE: Wellness plan claims: - Originally my claim denied entirely for $80 wellness exam, the $51 fecal testing and the $14 dewormer, the explanation being that those items were not covered. - I reached out for a review.The exam was covered and other items ignored. - Third review added $6 of the dewormer saying that was the max and the fecal testing was overlooked again. The wellness plan covers both in the amount of $20 and $50 respectively. - 4th review initiated by me covered all wellness items. Injury: - my kitten was taken in because it looked like he had injured his eye. He had no symptoms that aligned with conjunctivitis. The vet suspected an injury (annotated on his record sent to pets best), but she performed a diagnostic test for $27 to rule out a cornea ulcer. It was negative. I was sent home with no meds and the reassurance it would resolve in a day or so. It did. Pets Best denied the claim being it was inside the 14 day waiting period and classified it as an illness for conjunctivitis, which was listed NO WHERE on his chart. I was told by two separate representatives that specifically my issue with it being classified as an illness was being looked at. A week later, the claim is closed and nothing was addressed about his eye injury. I contacted pets best and was told that wasn't the correct process, and I had to write an appeal that can take up to 90 days. I'm so angry by the constant misinformation and the clear lack of detail on the initial claims reviewer. The reviewer clearly did not look at the claim closely or the wellness items would not be denied more than once. But now, I have to file an appeal which can take up to 90 days. Even though the company sees the initial reviewer messed up 100% of the other items on the initial claim, they completely refuse to review all decisions made by the initial reviewer. They clearly do not care about quality control or customers in refusing to at least review it even with the blatant other mistakes, but put the work on the customer to file more paperwork. Moreover, this being annotated as an illness instead of an injury now classifies this as a preexisting condition and therefore anything that presents as conjunctivitis (which this did not) will never be covered. I find it completely abhorrent a company would blatantly ignore language used by the vet - "likely injury" - in favor of words that the vet never used - "conjunctivitis" and "illness". If the vet suspected or noted conjunctivitis like symptoms, that would be written some where. None of the symptoms listed for conjunctivitis were present. It's especially abhorrent for non-medical professionals to ignore language used by medical professionals and insert language of their own that would deny future benefits. At best this gross oversight and should not require an appeal to review. At worst this is a scam. I am aware of how to contact pets best. I have had to 5 times. My claim is 5850082 should anyone want to do the right thing.
Insurer: Pets Best
By: Diana Pan