1
out of 5
POSTED: | BY: K
Dentistry Dishonesty
Denied a claim for dentistry with extractions (FORLs) due to a report of mild tartar prior to enrolment (8 years ago). Claim that dental tartar is diagnostic of periodontal disease, this is false.
If Trupanion used the term dental disease to describe the limits of their coverage, 85% of all companion animals would not qualify for ANY dental treatment unless, at their enrolment exam, 1) they are paediatric patients with normal occlusion 2) vets don't describe any oral examination in their records (this is against our regulations) 3) the patient actually has NO tartar, plaque, gingivitis et al (this is exceedingly rare)
They know this and by using periodontal disease, they claim they cover dentistry, but in fact don't.
I'm a veterinarian and find this claim denial not based in the evidence for dental pathology, but a convenient way to avoid paying for expensive procedures. If all animals with mild tartar (you can brush this off with a toothbrush) are denied dentistry claims in their future, this is not a medically nor evidence based decision, but one that is financially motivated.
I will no longer recommend this company to my clients, I will actively recommend against them, nor be a member myself.
Read more on Trustpilot