Other
Browse unique and miscellaneous pet insurance reviews that don’t fall into standard categories. Includes special experiences, feedback, and personal stories from real pet owners.
14,016 total
Other Categories
Because I feel that insurance for dogs should be like insurance is for humans.
Because I feel that insurance for dogs should be like insurance is for humans. You pay a monthly payment and you should get full coverage. To me it’s like insurance companies are getting rich with all these monthly payments from all its members while we pay an enormous amount for an accident to happen or a n emergency to arise. What if an emergency doesn’t happen for 12 yrs. My payment of $165 per month has accumulated to over $18,000! And for those of us that that take great care of our pets are being penalized for being great parents to our fur babies! Not fair honestly!
Insurer: Trupanion
By:
Because you are the best!
Because you are the best!
Insurer: Trupanion
By:
Happy and good health pet
Excellent
Insurer: Trupanion
By:
no one is purrfect
no one is purrfect
Insurer: Trupanion Canada
By:
No stress automated service!
Quick and painless as a good service should be!
Insurer: Trupanion Canada
By:
would like to retract the review I wrote in the last hour
In my review I complained about inability to reach a human. In going through my inbox, I found a message from a human which I had not seen. It was asking me 3 specific questions. I'd like to retract the review I just wrote; I would like you to not approve this one. I will write another when my outstanding claim is either approved or denied.
Insurer: Lemonade
By: Marie
Dont waste your money. Your better off putting it into savings and building an emergency fund
Waste of money. Claim after claim they deny coverage. one of our dogs was born with a recessed vulva (common in breed and many dogs) which most dogs will grow out of. She developed a UTI after a few months. Because the recessed vulva can lead to an UTI and noted at her birth it was a "pre-existing condition" (their perfect excuse not to pay) they not only refused to cover any related claims but stated any issue from her vagina through her urinary tract system would not be covered now or in the future. That's one example. They make excuses and rule out for anything moving forward based on "pre-existing condition" which they interpret to be anything related to the body part noted and anything attached to such. What's most frustrating is your premium is based upon the breed and likely common illness (risk for insurance claims) associated with those breeds. For our mastiffs it is a fairly healthy premium. Fair enough IF they then covered such illnesses that justify those premiums. These companies want it both ways. Justify the high premium then deny claims. Waste of money. Our yearly cost for both dogs was $2052. You'd be better off saving that money in an emergency account and in a year or two you'd have enough for most major incidents which was the reason we initially got it. And in disclosure we were huge proponents of pet insurance. Before her passing we carried insurance for our last mastiff for 8 plus years. in disclosure it was another provider and they denied a couple claims as well but overall felt they were fair. However our experience, premiums have doubled with the new dogs and claim approval basically nil. Save your money they are not honest nor will it provide you any assurance they are there for your pet. I know the $2000 will be in my account and accessible. Why pay them $160 + a month for weeks of submission and discussions to find they applied 10% to a deductible ($500) which will never be met with their games. Tis game should be illegal to be honest.
Insurer: Pets Best
By: Carmine