225,123+ Pet Insurance Reviews You Can Trust
Pet parents across the U.S. and Canada have left over 225,123 verified reviews—real stories, real experiences, real insight. Whether you're after the best price, fastest claims, or friendliest service, our reviews make it easy to compare top insurance providers and find the perfect coverage for your pets.
225,123 total
What are you looking for?
Most selected providers in "August, 2026"
This chart shows the distribution of the most selected pet insurance providers in August, 2026.
Providers with highest rating
20,008 reviews
11,406 reviews
5,987 reviews
55,033 reviews
15,593 reviews
Category with most reviews
This chart shows the distribution of review categories.
Awesome
Awesome! Filed my claim through the app, within 24 hours claim was closed!
Insurer: Figo
By: Dolores
LateOn claims and Not very prompt handling claims to
Not very prompt handling claims to Get insurance to cover bill after I pay it takes a while for your business To review The Claim
Insurer: Embrace
By: Christopher Cibulski
Embrce is the Place
Embrace Insurance makes it so easy to submit a claim and I really like the people who work here and are a pleasure to talk to.
Insurer: Embrace
By: Ann Marie Buffa
Quick automatic deposit once claim is completed
Quick and easy process to file a claim. Once the claim has been completed, it’s a quick turnaround to get your automatic deposit reimbursement as well.
Insurer: Embrace
By: Nichole LeCuyer-Dougal
HAVE NOT REQUIRED THIS YEAR
HAVE NOT REQUIRED THIS YEAR
Insurer: Figo
By: John Browning
Excellent Service!
fast, and easy way to file my claims!
Insurer: Embrace
By: Mariangeles Nava
The claims I’ve been forwarding via…
The claims I’ve been forwarding via email haven’t been getting recorded like they said they would be. I also feel like the reimbursements have been incorrect.
Insurer: Embrace
By: Alex
The claims process was easy to navigate…
The claims process was easy to navigate and reimbursement was received promptly.
Insurer: Embrace
By: Erin Borden
The test that were required to see what…
The test that were required to see what the problem wrong instead of saying it's an pre-existing condition is premature. Without these tests I would not know he had an enlarge heart. The tests should have been covered. All you care about is taking peoples money. How can you people that you are an animal lover. Pet insurances are rip offs. I hope you greedy people can live with that. What am I saying, you can live with that because you do not have a heart
Insurer: Spot
By: sharon solomon