3
out of 5
POSTED: | BY: Robin Lantrip
If they can find a way to deny claims, they will.
Honestly, I am disappointed with how the insurance denies claims by using pre-existing terms. I said it once, and I'll keep saying it. I already knew Piper had a murmur. I did not take her to the cardiologist to diagnosis the murmur, as it was already diagnosed. Nor, did I take her to the cardiologist to treat the murmur in any way. I took my puppy to the cardiologist prior to having my puppy spay to make sure she could withstand the anesthesia for the spay surgery. It was for the purpose of making sure I didn't make the wrong decision with putting her under. It was determined her heart was strong enough for the surgery, and honestly, finding out the murmur had actually subsided was a plus. But, of course, the insurance denied the claim for the cardiologist automatically saying it was for pre-existing illness. No, sorry... wasn't! Again, what part of the visit diagnosed or treated the murmur? In the notes from the cardiologist, it clearly states Piper is clear for spay surgery. That was the reason for the visit, so I wanted to make a statement about that in this review. I want people to know it is like every other insurance. If they can get out of paying a claim. They certainly will!