1
out of 5
POSTED: | BY: Bill
Claim Denied that Should have been paid
My dog recently had an ear infection, which was not a pre-existing condition and yet Embrace denied the claim. The "reason" cited was that somehow the ear is related to a dermatological condition. The Veterinarian could not believe this bogus reason for denying the claim since an inner ear infection is of course NOT a dermatological condition. If Embrace does not reprocess and pay I will never renew this insurance and plan to address this in my newspaper column. As a consumer advocate, I try to give the benefit of the doubt, but this is ridiculous. Like my Veterinarian, I am incredulous.