1
out of 5
POSTED: | BY: Abby Stavitsky
Waiting period and "pre-existing condition" nonsense
Had a terrible experience regarding my very first claim for my 9 year old female lab. She started limping-caused by either a dog park injury or onset of arthritis. Prudent Pet denied the claim, saying it was still the waiting period (it wasn't- waiting period ended 2 days before the injury/illness). When I appealed, it changed its rationale for the rejection-now said it was a "pre-existing" condition because my vet had recommended starting joint supplements as a preventative one month before I bought the insurance. Also ridiculously claimed that the vet visit for the limping was within the waiting period. I politely challenged them to show me where the vet summary said my dog had had a arthritis diagnosis- PP couldn't. I subsequently read other reviews that said PP often rejects claims on older dogs. Lesson learned. Will now pursue other options, ie Chewy insurance.
Read more on Trustpilot