2
out of 5
POSTED: | BY: Steph Kerridge
lack of common sense vs policy wording
I just joined Figo after hearing good things, but I have to say, my first experience with them has been pretty concerning and I'm considering changing to a different insurer already :(
Figo offers to waive the 6 month waiting period on any knee injuries if your vet examines the knees and finds them healthy. So I had my vet have examine my dog, and he wrote on her chart that he had examined all 4 legs including the joints and soft tissues, there were no abnormalities or indication of any problem. I uploaded this via the (very user friendly) app, and notified the company that I had done so.
They responded very quickly which was good, but I was told that the veterinarian was supposed to say he has examined her knees - so by saying that he had examined 4 legs and found them all healthy, I hadn't fulfilled the criteria to have the 6 month waiting period waived. I found it almost funny, how many legs do they think my dog has?
Although this is an easy problem to fix, it's left me very concerned that there is no common sense approach and that if I ever have to make a claim I would risk having denied it based on loopholes and traps in the policy wording. If they are this particular when it comes to waiving a waiting period, how can I be sure they would make good on an actual claim?
Read more on Trustpilot